[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: On XSLT 2.0 Writing Styles

Subject: RE: On XSLT 2.0 Writing Styles
From: "Michael Kay" <mhk@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2003 10:37:54 +0100
kay styles
> 
> Which one of these two styles should be preferred?
> 
> What are the advantages and shortcomings of each style 
> regarding readability, compactness, flexibility, efficiency 
> and maintainability?
> 
> Ideally, there should be an agreement (consensus) on the 
> answers to questions like these and one should be able to 
> find such answers easily in the archives and the FAQ.
> 

I think it will take a while for this consensus to emerge.

My own rule of thumb was until recently "use XPath to find nodes and to
compute atomic values, use XSLT to create new nodes". But with the
introduction of xsl:sequence, I've started avoiding really long
(20-line) path expressions, and have taken to breaking them up either by
using xsl:for-each and xsl:choose or by calls on stylesheet functions.

Michael Kay


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.