|
[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Automatically copying an element's attributes and
> > <ns0:acronym> > <xsl:copy-of select="@*"/> > > is a recoverabvle error as there is already a (white) text > node child of > <ns0:acronym> added to the result so you can no longer add attributes. > Yes - thanks - that's the explanation. I'm interested in people's views on "recoverable errors". In the case of errors like this that are clearly under the control of the stylesheet author, should we be making them non-recoverable (fatal) errors? Most of the new run-time error conditions in XSLT 2.0 are non-recoverable, but the old 1.0 ones haven't changed much. I think the original reasoning was that with client-side transformations in particular, it's better to put anything on the screen rather than a syntax error message. Does anyone think that's a valid argument? Michael Kay XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|

Cart








