[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: xslt 2. index-of, nodes

Subject: Re: xslt 2. index-of, nodes
From: Jeni Tennison <jeni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2003 15:02:30 +0100
xsl group
Dave,

>> Erm... my point was that if you were processing the group as a whole
>> then you could use the position() function to get you the position of
>> the <loc> within the group. Something like:
>> 
>>   <xsl:for-each-group select="loc" group-by="@hl">
>>     <xsl:for-each-group select="current-group()" group-by="@side">
>>       <xsl:for-each-group select="current-group()" group-by="@pos">
> Ah!
>   That's clearer. I've just been fighting group-by="concat...
>   which fails :-)

Oh? It shouldn't fail -- you should be able to do:

  <xsl:for-each-group select="loc"
                      group-by="concat(@hl, '+', @side, '+', @pos)">
    ...
  </xsl:for-each-group>

instead of the nesting above, just like you would in the use attribute
of <xsl:key> in 1.0.

Or you can do:

  <xsl:for-each-group select="loc"
                      group-by="string-join((@hl, @side, @pos), '+')">
    ...
  </xsl:for-each-group>

The reason that I didn't use it in the example is that (a) using
concat() is ugly (and string-join() only marginally less so),
particularly because you have to come up with a suitable separator for
the values that you want to include in the grouping key and (b) if
your attributes were typed (e.g. @pos as an xs:integer) then using
separate <xsl:for-each-group>s gives you datatype-aware grouping,
whereas using concat() or string-join() won't unless you are careful.

>> (I can't believe that no one apart from me is bothered about having
>> to nest <xsl:for-each-group> as in the above when you want to group
>> by several things at once.)
>
> Is this a starter for ten for Jeni's own equivalent of Muenchian
> techniques?

I would personally prefer something like:

  <xsl:for-each select="loc">
    <xsl:group by="@hl" />
    <xsl:group by="@side" />
    <xsl:group by="@pos" />
    ...
  </xsl:for-each>

but I've suggested it before and no one else seems to think it's worth
changing.

Cheers,

Jeni

---
Jeni Tennison
http://www.jenitennison.com/


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.