[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: extensions and XSLT 2.0

Subject: RE: extensions and XSLT 2.0
From: "Michael Kay" <mhk@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 18 May 2003 17:52:52 +0100
RE:  extensions and XSLT 2.0
> Thanks for your response, this is the confirmation of my 
> reading of the archives of the list and other articles.
> Then I've got 1 concrete question (more in fact, but let's 
> start with it) :
> I write an extension element in java with the saxon processor 
> by implementing the 
> net.sf.saxon.style.ExtensionElementFactory. It works, and I'm 
> very happy. But then, I have to change the implementation of 
> xslt, and move to xalan (or any other java processor). 
> I've got a problem, haven't I ?
> Saxon uses its own interface, and xalan too... So I've got to 
> rewrite my extension according to the xalan interface.
> I thought that XSLT 1.1 would provide independant interfaces 
> (in the same way that DOM does with the org.w3c.dom.* 
> package) in order to write portable code. Wouldn't it be more 
> simple and safe for user to have such a definition ?

Yes, it would be nice if there was a standard interface for doing this.

But the XSL WG decided that it was not their job, and no-one else has

Michael Kay

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

Current Thread


Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
First Name
Last Name
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.