[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Using or ignoring Types in XSLT 2.0 / XPath 2.0

Subject: RE: Using or ignoring Types in XSLT 2.0 / XPath 2.0
From: Andrew Watt <andrew@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 10:15:34 +0100
RE:  Using or ignoring Types in XSLT 2.0 / XPath 2.0
At 09:28 16/05/2003 +0100, you wrote:
> I still contend that type doesn't belong in XSLT,

Careful Kurt, Mike Kay will accuse you of talking rubbish!

Dave,


Inadvertently, I am sure, you omitted what Kurt went on to say. I quote it here for your convenience:

>I still contend that type doesn't belong in XSLT, but if it is in there, it
>should make processes more efficient, not less. If type needs to be there,
>then all of XSD should be supported, such that an XSLT function can return
>an object of complex type Foo.

Would you be happy if the XSLT WG went on to heed Kurt's second option and implemented all of XSD Schema?

Andrew Watt



XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.