RE: Re: document not there ambiguity

Hi,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-xsl-
> list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Daniel Veillard

> On Wed, Apr 23, 2003 at 11:57:51PM +0200, J.Pietschmann wrote:
> > If you dig deeper you'll uncover a lot more problems with document(),
> > both for users and implementors. For example, accessing the URL might
> > have side effects in the server, and some people want to access the URL
> 
>   The people who still don't understand that GET should not have
> side effects deserve to have failing code, failing business and
> get back to reading specs.

Sorry for misunderstanding.., but are you saying that people who use the
document() are idiots? Are you saying the people who say '*never* use
document,' are idiots? Are you just saying that you need to control what
happens with the uri resolution?

Curious,
-Rob

> 
> Daniel
> 
> --
> Daniel Veillard      | Red Hat Network https://rhn.redhat.com/
> veillard@xxxxxxxxxx  | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
> http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/
> 
>  XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list