RE: xslt2 grouping

> It wouldn't make sense to remove items with the same value for
> the group-by property as they are the things you are putting in each
> group. Clearly you want more than one thing in a group in general
> otherwise it would be a remove-duplicates function, not a grouping
> construct.

I can understand dp's point, when reading section 14 http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt20/#grouping of the spec it does give the impression that @group-by removes duplicates (instead of accessing them through current-group()).

There are also some typo's in the first example in 14.3, fn:position() in the stylesheet when theres no need for the namespace, and the results for France and Italy are collated out of document order (backwards).

Sorry if this isnt the place to raise the issues, Ive just noticed them. 

cheers
andrew


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.470 / Virus Database: 268 - Release Date: 08/04/2003
 

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list