[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: what does "AW:" mean?

Subject: RE: what does "AW:" mean?
From: "Dion Houston" <dionh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2003 13:31:32 -0800
what does aw mean
OK, I'll bite on this one...

3.6.5 says:

When used in a reply, the field body MAY start with the string "Re: "
(from the Latin "res", in the matter of) followed by the contents of the
"Subject:" field body of the original message.


The all upper case MAY is defined in RFC 2119 as:


This word, or the adjective "OPTIONAL", mean that an item is truly
optional. One vendor may choose to include the item because a particular
marketplace requires it or because the vendor feels that it enhances the
product while another vendor may omit the same item. An implementation
which does not include a particular option MUST be prepared to
interoperate with another implementation which does include the option,
though perhaps with reduced functionality. In the same vein an
implementation which does include a particular option MUST be prepared
to interoperate with another implementation which does not include the
option (except, of course, for the feature the option provides.) 


I think it's reasonable, accepted, and helpful that certain email
programs will localize the prefix to be more meaningful to their users
than arbitrarily stuffing a latin prefix on it :)

But this is off topic... I'll shut up now :)

Dion
-----Original Message-----
From: Trevor Jenkins [mailto:trevor.jenkins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 1:18 PM
To: XSL-List (E-mail)

On Tue, 18 Mar 2003, Lars Huttar <lars_huttar@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> I've seen subject lines like
>    Re: AW:  Syntax Problem
> What does the AW mean?

It means that someone is using an email program that is broken with
respect to RFC [2]822 where only "Re:" (and then only one of them) is
supposed to appear in a Subject: line. (Section 3.6.5 of 2822.) A
certain
softwre company is trying to mess with the Internet standards.

Regards, Trevor

British Sign Language is not inarticulate handwaving; it's a living
language.
Support the campaign for formal recognition by the British government
now!
Details at http://www.fdp.org.uk/

-- 

<>< Re: deemed!


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.