[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Which is more efficient?

Subject: RE: Which is more efficient?
From: "Passin, Tom" <tpassin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2003 15:29:26 -0500
RE:  Which is more efficient?
[ Caron, Daniel]
> 
> Which of these is the most efficient way of rendering html?  
> It's obvious
> which one is easier to code, but which one would actually parse more
> quickly?  In the abbreviated examples below, the difference, 
> of course would
> be negligible...but consider a page of a few thousand lines 
> of rendered
> HTML.

This will be entirely up to the design of the actual xslt processor.  It
has nothing to do with "parsing", since the time to parse and compile
the stylesheet will be negligible either way.  You would think that the
compiled stylesheet would be the same for both forms, but I am sure that
people like Mike Kay will have something to say about that pretty soon.

If you are seriously interested, make up some test cases and try them in
several different processors, since that is the only way to get
definitive results.


Cheers,

Tom P

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.