|
[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: is there really a need for location steps of ".."?
At 11:21 AM 3/12/2003, I wrote:
(The fact that ancestor:: is a reverse axis has a bearing on which node you'll get back, for example, from //part/ancestor::*[1], but not on the "order of nodes" in a set.) I should have said *nodes*, of course, unless there's only one part. Cheers! Wendell ___&&__&_&___&_&__&&&__&_&__&__&&____&&_&___&__&_&&_____&__&__&&_____&_&&_
"Thus I make my own use of the telegraph, without consulting
the directors, like the sparrows, which I perceive use it
extensively for a perch." -- ThoreauXSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|

Cart








