RE: is XSLT 2.0 implementable? (was: N : M transforma

>My only experience with levels of conformance is XSL-FO.
>How do you answer the point Daniel made, about the user hitting
>the 'not implemented' parts and getting v.frustrated.
>with fo, so far, its been a case of waiting for the darker corners
>to be implemented. Will xslt2 be a similar case? A bit like XT
>and keys not implemented?

I'm not a fan of FO, especially as it seems to me that the spec should
just drop all the aural stuff. I think one of the problems with
extremely large specs like XSL-FO is that it is difficult to implement
all of it. Will xslt2 be a similar case? Well, it's big (and somewhat
complicated in parts) as well, so my gut reaction is, too big for the
small boys to play with.

Agreed as always with any suggestion that XSDL should not in any way be
integrated with XSLT.




  




 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list