[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Re: The Perils of Sudden Type-Safety in XPath 2.0

Subject: Re: Re: The Perils of Sudden Type-Safety in XPath 2.0
From: "J.Pietschmann" <j3322ptm@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 22:24:14 +0100
Re:  Re: The Perils of Sudden Type-Safety in XPath 2.0
Américo Albuquerque wrote:
I have the feeling that a group of people has the goal of making XSLT a ridiculous language.
...
If they are, they only make that most users continue to use xslt1.0 and
that xslt2.0 might have the same fate of the xslt1.1

Which is a pity. BTW 1.1 was discontinued by the WG, I'm not aware it fell onto hard grounds on the user's side.

Why can't we have xsl:result-document, xsl:function, a
bunch of useful XPath functions and get rid of RTF without
all the NEW! and ENHANCED! PSVI dependent and other
grammar-changing XPath stuff? I can't see much of a
dependency.

J.Pietschmann


XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list



Current Thread

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.