|
[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: XMLPipe model: should we change the name?
Michael Kay wrote:
However that becomes a problem when the individual stylesheets in the pipeline are independentlyOne thing that we noticed when implementing stylesheet chaining/pipelining/ whatever in 4Suite (see, I can advertise, too) is the problem of what to do with external stylesheet parameters. Say you want to pass the output of stylesheet 1 to stylesheet 2, and stylesheet 2 needs some top-level parameters passed in. For now we just don't do anything; only the first stylesheet in the chain gets that privilege. So I'm curious... what does your system do in this regard? Or if you prefer not to divulge, what do people think a system developed (e.g. just use a ready made stylesheet that does not expect this type of "enhanced" content). Except of course if we adopt a common XML representation for transformation meta-information! Mike. (realises that this reply didn't suggest any solution... I'm working on it.. please wait until the XMLPipe -or whatever it will be called - is be finished :) Michael Kay XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|

Cart








