[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: XSL-FO versus PostScript

Subject: RE: XSL-FO versus PostScript
From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 19:18:51 GMT
RE:  XSL-FO versus PostScript
   >And earlier, IBM 
   >had a product, TeXML I think it was, which provided a declarative XML
   layer 
   >over TeX that you could target in a transform ... then a back end
   processor 
   >could render it into TeX. (Ah, now I see Joe K. has mentioned that.
   Check 
   >out alphaworks.ibm.com.)

   I'm rather interested in this one, did anyone ever try it out? 

Yes but only really for very early drafts of XSLT.
Once XSLT gained the text output method TeXML rather lost its
attraction as it's just as easy to generate the tex directly
than to generate the xml-ised tex and it's a whole lot easier to process
it.

David

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.