Re: Re: The Perils of Sudden Type-Safety in XPath 2.0
On Tuesday, February 25, 2003, at 04:24 PM, J.Pietschmann wrote:
Why can't we have xsl:result-document, xsl:function, a bunch of useful XPath functions and get rid of RTF without all the NEW! and ENHANCED! PSVI dependent and other grammar-changing XPath stuff? I can't see much of a dependency.
-- anti-spam: do not post this address publicly www.simonwoodside.com -- 99% Devil, 1% Angel
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format