[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: is XSLT 2.0 implementable? (was: N : M transforma

Subject: Re: is XSLT 2.0 implementable? (was: N : M transformation)
From: "Charles White" <chuck@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2003 07:12:10 -0800
Re:  is XSLT 2.0 implementable? (was:  N : M transforma
Wouldn't the easiest way to handle two levels of conformance be to simply
create two different recommendations with two different namespaces? Sort of
an XSLT 2.0 Schema Aware and an XSLT 2.0 Lite, the latter including some of
the newer capabilities people crave such as multiple output processing but
not otherwise really going much further than the current recommendation?

Chuck White
Author, Mastering XSLT, Sybex Books
http://www.javertising.com/webtech
http://www.tumeric.net
----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 6:08 AM
Subject: RE:  is XSLT 2.0 implementable? (was: N : M transformation)


> > But they have to pay the price of vastly increased complexity
> > in the specification (and one assumes in the text books that
> > will follow).
>
> If they were paying, either for the specs or for the products, then they
> might have more ability to influence the outcome...
>
> >
> > As the conformance levels are not specified it's hard to
> > comment on them but it would seem likely given the current
> > XSLT draft that given a document and a stylesheet which does
> > not refer to a schema explictly a schema-aware  XSLT engine
> > will produce different results (because it sees vastly
> > different input) than a non-schema aware processor...
>
> Yes, this is likely. We're exploring this area at the moment: for
> example there are suggestions that a stylesheet should be able to say
> whether it requires to use a schema-aware (or non-schema-aware)
> processor, to ensure interoperable results.
>
> Note that we already have this in a very basic form with ID attributes
> in XSLT 1.0; these will be recognized by the id() function or not,
> depending on the XML parser you use.
>
> Michael Kay
> Software AG
> home: Michael.H.Kay@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> work: Michael.Kay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
>  XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
>
>


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.