Re: Re: Reference to variable cannot be resolved.
> What the WD specifies is two or more x-s with exactly the same scope. not _exactly_ the same as the second isn't in the scope of the first. I agree it looks worse because there isn't an explicit scope marking but xsl:variable is really just (let ...) with an implicit end of scope ) inserted at the end of the parent element, isn't it? I agree to xsl:variables with the same name that are siblings are probably a user error, but in stopping that xslt1 also stopped rebinding inside explicit nested element scope as well, But I think basically we are saying the same thing (just making it look like an argument to make it interesting) > I think the biggest problem here is that the scope of a variable is no > longer obvious in these cases. David XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format