|
[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] XMLPipe model: should we change the name?
Hi!
This is simply an "ethical" matter, so any feedback will be highly appreciated! We are in the process of finishing the implementation of a model (in Java) that realises a number of ideas on transformation pipelining, heterogeneous documents combination and handling and a way to semi-automatically produce the correct combination of transformations for a specific application profile. Now, the core aspect of the whole architecture is the pipelining of transformations (mainly XSL-T) for the XML documents... And thus, the original name that I thought to give to the whole model and the implementation is "XMLPipe". However, there is the "XML Pipeline processing" wich is a quite different concept with a very similar name though! Plus, there is already the "XPipe" pipelining architecture. Moreover, XML* names should be reserved for W3C products and recommendations shouldn't they? So, my question is: Do you think that I should change the name before we make a public release of the model and implementation? Thanks for any advice on that, Cheers, Mike. P.S. BTW, this is an advertisement as well :) XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|

Cart








