|
[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: sax or dom in XSLT procesing ?
Sherzod Ruzmetov wrote:
:Of course SAX, don't waste memory for superfluous temporary DOM.The question was not about general events vs trees, but specifically, what's the most effective approach for feeding an xslt processor - emitting SAX events or building DOM object. Correct me if I'm wrong. Disadvantages of SAX are:I'd like to discuss it, but it seems to be sort of offtopic here. In fact, SAX-like processors are used to produce DOM-like processors.That's why I have recommended SAX as input for xslt. If almost every xslt processor always builds internal tree from its input, I don't see any advantage of building possible huge DOM object just to move data. -- Oleg Tkachenko eXperanto team Multiconn Technologies, Israel XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|

Cart








