Re: not(not() and not())

Play the video

Subject: Re: not(not() and not())
From: Brian Grainger <granam@xxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2002 23:15:06 -0700

At 05:14 AM 11/17/02 +0100, you wrote:

The first gives the correct result, but the second paints borders only on
all but the last rowgroup. Shouldn't "... and ..." always be the same as
"not(not(...) and not(...))"? If not, is it a better way to write the above?


not(not(...)) is two nested levels of not
not(...) is only one nested level of not

They can't be equivalent if you remove double negation in the first instance but only single negation in the second instance. You have to remove the same amount of negation from both instances.

Regards,
Brian

XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

Current Thread
not(not() and not()) Gustaf Liljegren - Sat, 16 Nov 2002 23:10:39 -0500 (EST) Brian Grainger - Sun, 17 Nov 2002 01:10:38 -0500 (EST) <= Roger Glover - Sun, 17 Nov 2002 01:32:48 -0500 (EST) <Possible follow-ups> Yates, Danny (ANTS) - Mon, 18 Nov 2002 03:56:31 -0500 (EST)

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
not(not() and not()), Gustaf Liljegren	Thread	Re: not(not() and not()), Roger Glover
not(not() and not()), Gustaf Liljegren	Date	Re: not(not() and not()), Roger Glover
	Month

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Subscribe in XML format

RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3

XML Editor - Download a 15 Day Free Trial Now >

See What's New in Stylus Studio >

Buy Stylus Studio - XML Editor - Now >