RE: [sly] Minimum value

--- "Avula, Raj" <RAvula at firstam dot com> wrote:

> That's really great! 
> I was really thinking of writing recursive templates to this.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> Raja..
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marrow [mailto:marrow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 2:17 PM
> To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE:  Minimum value
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Try...
> 
>   <xsl:value-of select="//value[not(. &gt; //value)]"/>
> 
> (replace the // with the full path as required)


Yes, it is great that XPath has the power to specify the minimum of a
node-set just in one expression.

However, this often comes at a price. In this case the time complexity
(speed-related) is O(n^2), which is better not used in
industrial-strength applications.

You can use a generic "minimum" template from the FXSL library (O(n)),
or you can code your own recursive named template with the same linear
complexity.

The FXSL "minimum" template allows a "less-than" function to be passed
as a parameter, thus it implements finding the minimum over any set
that has an ordering relation "<=".



=====
Cheers,

Dimitre Novatchev.
http://fxsl.sourceforge.net/ -- the home of FXSL

__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
New DSL Internet Access from SBC & Yahoo!
http://sbc.yahoo.com

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list