RE: generalized unique element

From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To: <xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE:  generalized unique element
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 17:09:07 +0100

> Mike> It all gets easier in XPath 2.0, where you can write
> Mike>
> Mike> <xsl:if test="every $x in preceding-sibling::*
> Mike>               satisfies name($x) != name(.)">
>
> Are you _sure_ that's easier than
>
> <xsl:if test="preceding-sibling::*[name(.)=name(current())]">
>

Well, I can't say it's a simpler solution; but in my case, this
afternoon, it was a solution that I found more easily.

Michael Kay


XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

_________________________________________________________________
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com