Re: generalized unique element
Mike> It all gets easier in XPath 2.0, where you can write Mike> Mike> <xsl:if test="every $x in preceding-sibling::* Mike> satisfies name($x) != name(.)"> Are you _sure_ that's easier than <xsl:if test="preceding-sibling::*[name(.)=name(current())]"> (it gets more useful in nested contexts where current() doesn't do the right thing) David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format