|
[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
[Recent Entries]
[Reply To This Message]
RE: XSL: For-Each Efficient or Not?
Subject: RE: XSL: For-Each Efficient or Not?
From: Wendell Piez <wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2002 17:46:44 -0400
|
Mike,
At 03:11 PM 7/1/2002, you wrote:
It's not that difficult. Saxon doesn't quite achieve this today but it
will in the next release (I just tested it).
X[position() = 1 and name()='factorof']
can be statically rewritten as
X[1][name()='factorof']
That's cool!
Will it do the same for X[name()='factorof' and position()=1] ?
Cheers,
Wendell
======================================================================
Wendell Piez mailto:wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Mulberry Technologies, Inc. http://www.mulberrytech.com
17 West Jefferson Street Direct Phone: 301/315-9635
Suite 207 Phone: 301/315-9631
Rockville, MD 20850 Fax: 301/315-8285
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mulberry Technologies: A Consultancy Specializing in SGML and XML
======================================================================
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|---|
- RE: XSL: For-Each Efficient or Not?, (continued)
- bryan - Mon, 1 Jul 2002 12:08:49 -0400 (EDT)
- Johannes Döbler - Mon, 1 Jul 2002 12:57:29 -0400 (EDT)
- Wendell Piez - Mon, 1 Jul 2002 13:57:16 -0400 (EDT)
- Michael Kay - Mon, 1 Jul 2002 15:09:03 -0400 (EDT)
- Wendell Piez - Mon, 1 Jul 2002 17:49:48 -0400 (EDT) <=
- Michael Kay - Tue, 2 Jul 2002 04:11:16 -0400 (EDT)
- Kevin Jones - Mon, 1 Jul 2002 18:16:57 -0400 (EDT)
- Michael Kay - Tue, 2 Jul 2002 04:32:02 -0400 (EDT)
- Ranjith Kodikara - Tue, 2 Jul 2002 05:08:45 -0400 (EDT)
|
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format
| RSS 2.0 |
|
| Atom 0.3 |
|
|
Cart
