Re: more encoding woe

Andrew Welch wrote:
> 
> Is this the case?  If I specify 
> 
>  { font-family:Arial, Arial Unicode MS }
> 
> IE doesn't display the glyphs, suggesting that it isn't looking into
> Arial Unicode MS for the missing font.

Have a look at the "font linking" section of this document:

  http://www.unicode.org/iuc/iuc16/c6/paper.pdf

It doesn't provide any examples, but if I read correctly, the "lang" attribute
in the HTML, and the charset parameter on the Content-Type metadata, are hints
that are used in this process, while CSS properties and rules take higher 
precedence.

   - Mike
____________________________________________________________________________
  mike j. brown                   |  xml/xslt: http://skew.org/xml/
  denver/boulder, colorado, usa   |  resume: http://skew.org/~mike/resume/

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list