Hi Joel,

it makes no sense to use xml if you have all your content in your
xsl-stylesheet!

You have wrapped your entire html page in a template!

Greetings,

Hans Braumüller 
-- + -- 
Networking Artist
http://crosses.net
http://kunstserie.com

 

> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]Im Auftrag von Joel
> Konkle-Parker
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 26. Juni 2002 16:42
> An: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Betreff: Re:  How to throw transformation to browser
> 
> 
> Actually, part of your statement isn't true. My site
> (http://www.ballsome.com/test/) combines XML and XSLT 
> client-side, and works
> with both IE 6+ and Netscape 6+. Perhaps it's something 
> specific to your code?
> 
> -joeljkp
> 
> Quoting Scott Purcell <spurcell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> 
> > Hello,
> > I have a good xml file and a good xslt file. Up until today, we have
> > included a stylesheet reference in the xml to the xsl file 
> and let the
> > browser combine them for display. (Works only in IE).
> > 
> > I have been told to investigate combinining the two files 
> (xml and xsl)
> > server side. I investigated some avenues and came up with 
> Cocoon, and
> > Xalan. Are these the best ways to do this? Which is easiest to
> > implement.
> > 
> > Also a coworker mentioned that we may possibly do a dom 
> thing and build
> > the html dynamically? Does this make sense?
> > 
> > Thanks
> > 
> >  XSL-List info and archive:  
http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
> 
> 



-------------------------------------------------------
http://www.ballsome.com

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list