On Wed, 5 Jun 2002, Michael Kay wrote:

I guess it is unfair to mention namespaces in same context 
as XML Schema

It takes some time before you get used to them, but they are often very 
useful 
and in my opinion  the namespace specification is a 
rather good one. 

I cannot say the same about XML Schema :

http://www.imc.org/ietf-xml-use/mail-archive/msg00225.html
 


> > Enough W3C members could get their AC reps to say No when it 
> > comes up for PR and it could be sent back to the WGs for 
> > reconsideration.
> 
> Unfortunately those AC reps are the same people who voted to make XML
> Schema a rec: getting people to admit that they have made a big mistake
> is an uphill struggle, especially when the decision to endorse XML
> Schema is reflected in their committed product strategy.
> 
> I wish XML Schema would go away (I still wish namespaces would go
> away...) but it won't.
> 
> Michael Kay
> Software AG
> home: Michael.H.Kay@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> work: Michael.Kay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> 
> 
>  XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
> 

-- 
******************************************
<firstName> Miloslav </firstName>
<surname>   Nic      </surname>

<mail>    nicmila@xxxxxxxxxxxx    </mail>
<support> http://www.zvon.org  </support>


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list