Subject: Re: XSL-List Digest V4 #421
From: Matt Gushee <mgushee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2002 15:47:34 -0600
|
> From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> > > Most popular XSLT processors are written in Java, Python, or Perl:
> > > Saxon, Xalan, 4XSLT ... xsltproc is faster than them by a wide and
> > > probably permanent margin.
> >
> > I don't want to get into a which is faster debate but this is
> > really suspect.
> >
> If you are measuring a single-shot transformation executed from the
> command line then of course the Java processors have a big disadvantage
> because the Java VM takes 5 seconds or so to warm up. So as always,
> different people will get different answers if they measure different
> things.
Good point. I will refrain from blanket speed comparisons in the future.
--
Matt Gushee
Englewood, Colorado, USA
mgushee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.havenrock.com/
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|