Re: XSLT/XPath 2.0 (was "Identifying two tags...")
It's good to raise those concerns now, while the WGs are still considering which parts of, for example, XPath 2.0 are really necessary. I encourage you, and indeed everyone, to write to public-qt-comments@xxxxxx describing what parts you find particularly hard to understand and which parts you think are unnecessary.
I'd also add to Jeni's note that if you (or anyone else) are in favor of a conformance level for XSLT 2.0 that does not require XML Schema validation,
we would like to hear about it, including any specific requirements for what such a conformance level would entail. You may have a better chance of success if you put your hopes in a conformance level, rather than trying to fight the inclusion of XML Schemas altogether.
Evan Lenz (speaking for himself only, not for the XSL WG)
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format