[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: java methods vs XSL templates

Subject: RE: java methods vs XSL templates
From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 17:49:58 +0100
calling java methods in xsl
> I have requirement for functionalities like date format 
> conversion ie from YYYYMMDD to DD:MM:YY.. now i can write a 
> java method that does this or i can write a xsl template 
> that will do this.I can then store it in an utility XSL file and keep 
> calling that template through xsl:call-templates , and pass 
> the date as 
> parameter and store the return value in a variable.
> 
> i however think that writing a java method is a  more elegant 
> way of doing 
> this ,as java code is precomplied and would take less processing time.
> 
It's easy to do this using concat() and substring().

The extra processing speed of Java is offset by the cost of doing a
function call from one language environment to another, and by the loss
of portability.

Michael Kay
Software AG
home: Michael.H.Kay@xxxxxxxxxxxx
work: Michael.Kay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.