> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of 
> Dimitre Novatchev

> Therefore, would it be possible, ***please***, to produce a short,
> one-paragraph specification for vendor:node-set(), which says that it
> should also accept node-sets, including the empty one?
> 
> I regard this as a "mini-EXSLT", just covering the 
> vendor:node-set() function, which is a de-facto standard, but appears
> to lack a specification...

Yes, I think it would be extremly useful but how could we force xslt implementors to adhere that spec?
Anyway such kind of community-approved spec would be much better than nothing.

---
Oleg Tkachenko,
Multiconn International, Israel 


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list