Re: RE: Re: Selecting Maximum Values

> Without extensions and resort to sorting, something like this should
work:
> (considering that the maximum of a list is either the head or the 
> maximum of the tail of the list)

Because this was a reply to the message offering an FXSL solution, let
me confirm that using FXSL does not require the use of extension
functions, apart from vendor:node-set().

Maybe you also didn'rt understand what "to pass a function as a
parameter" means -- in this case reading this will help:

http://www.topxml.com/xsl/articles/fp/


Cheers,
Dimitre Novatchev.





__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Sports - live college hoops coverage
http://sports.yahoo.com/

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list