Re: RE: RFC XSLT Standard - "Further support for varia

> Could the change set 1 - 3 be part of an official extention to the
> XSLT 2.0 Core. Being an official extension means that syntax and
> semantics are defined for all implementations. But being an extension
> means that the compilation based engine writers (and others) just
> choose not to support a given extension that their engine can not
> handle.
> 
> Also I believe there is syntax in XSLT 2.0 to support a style sheet
> saying what extensions it uses, just making it clear to the reader 
> that such non-core features are in use.

I regard the proposed features as a "dirty" and limited way to
implement higher order functions in XSLT.

Better go for the real thing.


Cheers,
Dimitre Novatchev.



__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Try FREE Yahoo! Mail - the world's greatest free email!
http://mail.yahoo.com/

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list