RE: RFC XSLT Standard - "Further support for variable

Quoting Michael Kay <michael.h.kay@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:

> 5.1 (xsl:output) is already done in the XSLT 2.0 WD (in fact, it was
> done in
> XSLT 1.1).
> 
> I must admit I thought we had changed xsl:message to allow an AVT (4.1)
> and
> was surprised to discover that we hadn't.
> 
> I think there will be some resistance from members of the WG to
> changing
> those attributes whose values are QNames of objects defined in the
> stylesheet (mode, template name, use attribute sets). Compiled
> languages
> generally don't keep their symbol tables around at run-time. There's
> also
> the problem of keeping namespace declarations around at run-time (though
> the
> key() function sets a precedent).
> 
> It's also hard to think of many languages (COBOL is the only one that
> comes
> to mind) that allow a function or subroutine to be called by supplying
> its
> name as a string.

This is possible in a number of Lisp dialects, but I suppose that doesn't 
surprise anyone.  I don;t know much about FORTH but I'd expect it might
allow this as well.


[...]

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list