|
[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Value-of, copy-of
Mike and Eric,
Mini XPath abbreviations lesson: [1] '.' is short for 'self::node()' so <xsl:copy-of select="."/> is saying "copy the context node". [2] if no axis is given in the step of a location path, interpolate "child::" so <xsl:copy-of select="node()"/> is short for <xsl:copy-of select="child::node()"/>, i.e. "copy the child nodes of the context node". This is what accounts for the behavior you're seeing. At 12:17 PM 2/27/2002, Mike wrote: I changed my style sheet and got the results I wanted. I read on p. 187 of Kay's book (1st edition) that copy-of is gives you the content without the opening and closing tag of the node, if you use it with Strictly speaking, it's not that the node is copied without its tags -- it's that the node is not copied, but all its children are. (Tags only appear when and if the result tree gets serialized as markup.) He also says that xsl:copy-of does not allow you to controll what nodes are being included in the output (p. 182), but xsl:copy does. That was another problem I am having. Yep: xsl:copy-of gives you a "deep copy" (all the way down from the node you copy), while xsl:copy only copies one level, while allowing you include more instructions (such as apply-templates) to graft more stuff under the node you've copied. I hope that clears things up a bit, Wendell
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|

Cart








