RE: keep properties

> From: Carmelo Montanez [mailto:carmelo@xxxxxxxx]

> Shall we interpret that as the very next FO (even if its a child)
> or the next sibling.  Consider this scenario
> 
> 1    <fo:inline keep-with-next= "always">
> 2      <fo:external-graphic 
> src="somegraphic.gif"></fo:external-graphic>
> 3    </foinline>
> 4   <fo:inline>and some stuff here.</fo:inline>
> 
> The way I read it, keep-with-next refers to the 
> external-graphic on the
> line labeled "2" and NOT the inline on the line labeled "4".  I take
> it "keep-with-previous" follows a similar logic.  Anyone else
> reads it differently?
4.8
For any given formatting object, the next formatting object in the flow is
the first formatting object following (in the pre-order traversal order)
which is not a descendant of the given formatting object and which generates
and returns normal areas.

so I guess the spec disagrees with you. Note the 'not a descendant'.

Regards DaveP


- 

NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments is 
confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the 
intended recipient you are hereby notified that you must not use, 
disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this email's content. If 
you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender 
immediately and then delete the email and any attachments from your 
system.

RNIB has made strenuous efforts to ensure that emails and any 
attachments generated by its staff are free from viruses. However, it 
cannot accept any responsibility for any viruses which are 
transmitted. We therefore recommend you scan all attachments.

Please note that the statements and views expressed in this email 
and any attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of RNIB.

RNIB Registered Charity Number: 226227

Website: http://www.rnib.org.uk 

14th June 2002 is RNIB Look Loud Day - visit http://www.lookloud.org.uk to
find out all about it.


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list