Subject: Re: Re: A question about the expressive power and limitations of XPath 2.0
From: Jeni Tennison <jeni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2002 18:56:55 +0000
|
David,
>> We would have to address here the problem that Marc pointed out to do
>> with how repeated subexpressions are captured...
>
> probably you'd just have to do whatever perl does with the meaning of
> numbered subterms that are repeated.
Apparently that's "capture the last one". So if you had:
match('bar', '(.){3}')
then the first subexpression would have the value 'r'.
I can see why that's the case - otherwise you wouldn't be able to
predictably access matched subexpressions after that one by number.
Cheers,
Jeni
---
Jeni Tennison
http://www.jenitennison.com/
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|
Jeni Tennison - Sun, 13 Jan 2002 05:54:32 -0500 (EST)
|
|