Subject: Re: Regular expression functions (Was: Re: comments on December F&O draft)
From: Jeni Tennison <jeni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 14:01:43 +0000
|
David,
>> To give you an idea about what I'm going on about, the signature of
>> the function I have in mind is:
>
> the system which I use to read the email on this list, and to write
> xsl stylesheets, provides the following functions:
Well int emacs wunnerful ;)
I was kinda describing match-string, but with nested subexpressions -
I like the idea of nested subexpressions, especially when coupled with
named subexpressions, like I was talking about with Marc.
But I guess that we should keep it simple, to build on familiarity
with regexps in other languages.
Cheers,
Jeni
---
Jeni Tennison
http://www.jenitennison.com/
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
- RE: Regular expression functions (Was: Re: comments on December F&O draft), (continued)
- Steven Noels - Thu, 10 Jan 2002 05:44:28 -0500 (EST)
- David Carlisle - Thu, 10 Jan 2002 06:23:00 -0500 (EST)
- Jeni Tennison - Thu, 10 Jan 2002 07:46:23 -0500 (EST)
- David Carlisle - Thu, 10 Jan 2002 08:11:41 -0500 (EST)
- Jeni Tennison - Thu, 10 Jan 2002 09:00:17 -0500 (EST) <=
- Marc Portier - Thu, 10 Jan 2002 06:32:12 -0500 (EST)
- Jeni Tennison - Thu, 10 Jan 2002 08:03:38 -0500 (EST)
- Marc Portier - Thu, 10 Jan 2002 18:47:47 -0500 (EST)
- Jeni Tennison - Fri, 11 Jan 2002 05:42:37 -0500 (EST)
|
|