RE: xslt/xpath 2.0 comments ( long )

> I might be misunderstanding you, but it seems to me that given that
> the user is writing a wrapper function, they should be putting that
> wrapper function in their own namespace rather than the one for
> Saxon extensions.  So this is consistent with or supports the idea
> of the processor giving an error when one of its extension functions
> are redefined.

Of course they should use their own namespace. But when writing the spec, we
have to say what happens if they don't.

Mike Kay


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list