|
[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: The evaluate function
I knew I'd be tapping into some controversy... Just didn't know how fierce :) I'm still unclear how the addition of a dynamic eval, if implemented as a function, would violate the assumption that all (other) expressions are static. Would it be possible to treat these as special and treat the rest as optimizable? > Without answering your question, I'll address what I think you're implying :) No implication intended. I really do want to know which processors don't support the eval function. If I end up relying on the existence of such a capability (without the support of the standard) I'd at least like to know that it's generally available. (Yes, I know, bad practice in the standards world). > Introducing evaluate() now, IMHO, would be an example of premature optimization. Hmm? Are you saying that it's too early in the language's history to introduce such a feature (and remove the assumption of static expressions)? If so, wouldn't it be an example of premature de-optimization ;-) Mark XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|

Cart








