Subject: Re: XPath's role (Was: Re: Re: . in for)
From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 18:07:00 GMT
|
Mike Kay
> I've been wondering whether we should allow the "$" in name="$emps" to
> remove the inconsistency.
I think I'd rather the $ was removed from the xpath binding operators,
if it can be done without too many parsing problems and without
introducing keywords. I find having the $ there rather confusing.
David
(I suppose this should be back on the official xpath comment list...)
_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call
Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
- RE: XPath's role (Was: Re: Re: . in for), (continued)
- Michael Kay - Sun, 6 Jan 2002 14:52:34 -0500 (EST)
- Michael Kay - Mon, 7 Jan 2002 10:30:26 -0500 (EST)
- David Carlisle - Mon, 7 Jan 2002 10:54:34 -0500 (EST)
- Michael Kay - Mon, 7 Jan 2002 11:37:15 -0500 (EST)
- David Carlisle - Mon, 7 Jan 2002 13:06:29 -0500 (EST) <=
- Jeni Tennison - Mon, 7 Jan 2002 11:23:57 -0500 (EST)
- Michael Kay - Mon, 7 Jan 2002 11:58:25 -0500 (EST)
- Jeni Tennison - Mon, 7 Jan 2002 13:26:04 -0500 (EST)
- Michael Kay - Mon, 7 Jan 2002 17:28:42 -0500 (EST)
|
|