Subject: RE: RE: Postional predicates de-mystified
From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 16:08:29 -0000
|
> > Also note common error #2 - t
> This one I did know, even if my message fell into the hole:-)
> (although it would probably be less error prone if for
> changed the focus
> so that . was the inner most bound variable.) (Mike?)
>
Or even if it returned the error object.
Raise a comment on xpath-comments, and it will get back on the agenda.
Mike Kay
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|