> David: yes there is--it's defined in XSLT 1.1 No, there is not. XSLT 1.1 was a working draft, the working group have explictly said that they do not intend to progress XSLT 1.1 to REC status. So anything described in XSLT 1.1 draft is not XSLT, it is just an indication of some ideas for new features that the working group had at that time. > Or, see pg 293 of Kay's XSLT, 2nd edition. As Mike makes (more or less) clear in his book, that is describing some experimental features that may or may not make it into XSLT. Having said that, XSLT 1.1's xsl:script is/was a top level element and this was used in a template, so I don't think the original poster was using xslt 1.1. I suspect that it wasn't XSL at all but the transformation language of IE5. David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format