[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: XML Schema/XSL conflict (can't differentiate unqua

Subject: RE: XML Schema/XSL conflict (can't differentiate unqualified locals)?
From: "Michael Kay" <mhkay@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2001 10:24:12 +0100
xml explicit differentiate
> PLEASE PLEASE TELL ME. What is it about namespaces that people don't
> understand.

I think namespaces are intrinsically very confusing.

(1) people don't understand that there is no "resource" that the URI
identifies

(2) people don't understand why the rules are different for elements and
attributes

(3) people don't understand whether or not prefixes are supposed to be
significant

(4) people don't understand the arbitrariness of some of the rules, e.g.
that the default namespace can go out of scope for descendants but an
explicit namespace can't

(5) people don't understand the difference between namespace nodes and
namespace declarations

(6) people don't understand the difference between namespace declarations
and attributes

In my view, namespaces are a disastrously bad piece of design, almost as bad
as DTDs. All these confusions derive directly from the decision to add a
fundamental architectural feature to XML as a "bolt-on extra", which is
almost always bad software engineering.

Mike Kay


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.