Re: XSL Standards?
Michael Kay wrote: > > I think it was just priorities, coupled with insufficient experience in the > early days of actual user requirements. Extension functions were thought to > be needed primarily for access to external resources, and to algorithms (e.g > regexp) which no one would dream of coding in XSLT. Of course that changed > over time and the requirement to write extension functions in XSLT is now in > the published XSLT 2.0 requirements. > Thanks - sorry for the extended moan! Francis. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format