RE: html output

All this non-portable effort to create invalid HTML?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Corey Spitzer
> Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 4:13 PM
> To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE:  html output
> 
> 
> try <xsl:text
> disable-output-escaping="yes">&lt;ul></xsl:text><xsl:apply-templates/>(or
> whatever)<xsl:text disable-output-escaping="yes">&lt;/ul></xsl:text>
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of David
> Carlisle
> Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 8:27 AM
> To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re:  html output
> 
> 
> 
> > However, it seems the empty list <ul></ul> still get translated to
> > <ul/>,
> 
> which XSLT system are you using (sounds like a bug) the html output
> method should not use XML empty element syntax.
> 
> David
> 
> _____________________________________________________________________
> This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
> delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
> information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call
> Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.
> 
>  XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
> 
> 
>  XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
> 

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list