RE: xsl:number again

Michael Kay writes:
 > Are you suggesting the spec is unclear? It seems clear enough to me:
 > each number after the first is preceded by the separator token that precedes
 > the format token used to format it; and if the last token is a
 > non-aphanumeric one, it gets added at the end. So I don't thing there's any
 > excuse for a pattern that ends in "1" to produce a number with a "." at the
 > end. Raise bug reports!

I cringe. I thought I had sent that note to the libxslt list, not the
xslt general list. I cringe.

Sebastian


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list