Subject: RE: SAXON and UTF-8
From: "Scott Carter" <scottc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 08:31:11 -0600
|
Please see the following FAQ entry from the Unicode web site:
http://www.unicode.org/unicode/faq/utf_bom.html#25.
Scott Carter
TurboPower Software
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Goetz Bock [mailto:bock@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2001 8:19 AM
> To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: SAXON and UTF-8
>
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 27 '01 at 15:47, Julian Reschke wrote:
> > But then maybe it's the missing support for UTF-8 Byte Order Marks?
> UTF-8 does not feature a Byte Order Mark, only UTF-16 does.
>
> An xml file must either start with an BOM, than it is UTF-16, or <?
> than it's what ever encoding is defines. Note that all characters in
> the xml decleration:
>
> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
>
> must be ASCII 7bit (what AFAIK is the same for all Unicode encodings).
>
> BTW: The original author already noted, that the error is 1477 bytes
> into the docukent. So this mail is just to fight the FUD.
>
> --
> Goetz Bock IT Consultant
> Dipl.-Inf. Univ.
>
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|
Dimitar Peikov - Thu, 27 Sep 2001 09:38:08 -0400 (EDT)
Scott Carter - Thu, 27 Sep 2001 10:42:37 -0400 (EDT) <=
Scott Carter - Thu, 27 Sep 2001 11:02:03 -0400 (EDT)
|
|