Subject: RE: XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 Functions and Operators Version 1.0
From: "Chris Bayes" <chris@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2001 21:10:40 +0100
|
> The idea is that a variable which in XPath 1.0 holds a node-set,
> should in XPath 2.0 hold a sequence of nodes, the sequence being
> in document order with no duplicates.
If a sequence can't contain duplicates what do you get from
index-of(concat(A B, B A), A) or item-at(concat(A B, B A), 1)
Ciao Chris
XML/XSL Portal
http://www.bayes.co.uk/xml
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
- RE: XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 Functions and Operators Version 1.0, (continued)
- DPawson - Fri, 7 Sep 2001 06:45:09 -0400 (EDT)
- Michael Kay - Fri, 7 Sep 2001 08:14:17 -0400 (EDT)
- Chris Bayes - Fri, 7 Sep 2001 09:31:50 -0400 (EDT)
- Michael Kay - Fri, 7 Sep 2001 11:37:51 -0400 (EDT)
- Chris Bayes - Fri, 7 Sep 2001 16:21:42 -0400 (EDT) <=
- Michael Kay - Fri, 7 Sep 2001 18:10:37 -0400 (EDT)
- Chris Bayes - Sat, 8 Sep 2001 01:57:59 -0400 (EDT)
- Chris Bayes - Sat, 8 Sep 2001 02:11:54 -0400 (EDT)
- Max Dunn - Sat, 8 Sep 2001 02:30:18 -0400 (EDT)
|
|