[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: l "& #xA0; vs & #160;" version 2 proposal.

Subject: RE: l "& #xA0; vs & #160;" version 2 proposal.
From: "Michael Kay" <mhkay@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2001 09:26:23 +0100
xa0 160
> Considering the number of questions this raises,
> How many rules would be broken if &nbsp; were added
> to an XSLT engine? I.e. put in as part of the rec?
>
What exactly are you proposing?

Mandating that with the HTML output method, the Unicode character "no-break
space" should always be serialized as "&nbsp;", perhaps?

My main concern about this is that it would open the floodgates, creating
pressure to standardize other aspects of the serialized output. I think I'd
prefer this to be left to implementers.

Mike Kay


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.